Coppermill Primary School

Primary · Waltham Forest · E17 6PB · URN 103078

Ofsted GoodLast inspected 2024-06-14Cohort 195

Exam results, in full

Every figure below comes straight from the Department for Education performance tables. We show the coverage we hold, how the school compares with its local area and with England, and which part of the score each figure feeds, so you can see exactly how the ranking was built.

Key stage 2 results

Taken by pupils at the end of Year 6, so they describe a primary school.

2024-2025 results · cohort 21

4 of 4 headline figuresArea average from 53 schools in Waltham Forest

Reached the expected standard in reading, writing and maths
86%
Waltham Forest 70.3%England 61%
15.7 percentage points above the area average of 70.3
Overall standards
Reached the higher standard in reading, writing and maths
14%
Waltham Forest 15.5%England 8%
1.5 percentage points below the area average of 15.5
Academic stretch
Average scaled score in reading
111
Waltham Forest 107.62England 105
3.4 above the area average of 107.6
Overall standards
Average scaled score in maths
109
Waltham Forest 107.28England 105
1.7 above the area average of 107.3
Overall standards
Average scaled score in grammar, punctuation and spelling
112
Waltham Forest 107.57England 105
4.4 above the area average of 107.6
Overall standards
Higher standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling
62%
Waltham Forest 40.2%England 32%
21.8 percentage points above the area average of 40.2
Academic stretch
Expected standard in reading
90%
Waltham Forest 79.2%
10.8 percentage points above the area average of 79.2
Context only, not scored
Expected standard in writing
86%
Waltham Forest 76.7%
9.3 percentage points above the area average of 76.7
Context only, not scored
Expected standard in maths
95%
Waltham Forest 79.3%
15.7 percentage points above the area average of 79.3
Context only, not scored
Pupils in the results cohort
21
Waltham Forest 58
36.6 below the area average of 57.6
Context only, not scored

Measure	This school	Against Waltham Forest	Against national	Feeds
Reached the expected standard in reading, writing and maths	86% Waltham Forest 70.3%England 61%	15.7 percentage points above the area average of 70.3	25 percentage points above the national figure of 61	Overall standards
Reached the higher standard in reading, writing and maths	14% Waltham Forest 15.5%England 8%	1.5 percentage points below the area average of 15.5	6 percentage points above the national figure of 8	Academic stretch
Average scaled score in reading	111 Waltham Forest 107.62England 105	3.4 above the area average of 107.6	6 above the national figure of 105	Overall standards
Average scaled score in maths	109 Waltham Forest 107.28England 105	1.7 above the area average of 107.3	4 above the national figure of 105	Overall standards
Average scaled score in grammar, punctuation and spelling	112 Waltham Forest 107.57England 105	4.4 above the area average of 107.6	7 above the national figure of 105	Overall standards
Higher standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling	62% Waltham Forest 40.2%England 32%	21.8 percentage points above the area average of 40.2	30 percentage points above the national figure of 32	Academic stretch
Expected standard in reading	90% Waltham Forest 79.2%	10.8 percentage points above the area average of 79.2	No national comparison	Context only, not scored
Expected standard in writing	86% Waltham Forest 76.7%	9.3 percentage points above the area average of 76.7	No national comparison	Context only, not scored
Expected standard in maths	95% Waltham Forest 79.3%	15.7 percentage points above the area average of 79.3	No national comparison	Context only, not scored
Pupils in the results cohort	21 Waltham Forest 58	36.6 below the area average of 57.6	No national comparison	Context only, not scored

Withheld figures are suppressed at source to protect small cohorts. Figures marked not published are ones the department no longer publishes for any school. Source: DfE performance tables, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Local authority average class size

Area benchmark

Waltham Forest · State-funded schools · 2025/26

Primary classes: 26.7 pupils per class

This is the council-area average, not this school’s class size. It is not used in your scorecard ranking.

Source: DfE school census · 2025/26

Published figures

English as an additional language: 48.7% of pupils
Eligible for free school meals: 13.8% of pupils
Pupils on SEN support: 18.5% of pupils
Pupils per adult, including teaching assistants: 9.9pupils per adult
Higher standard in grammar, punctuation and spelling: 62% of pupils
Reached the higher standard in reading, writing and maths: 14% of pupils
Pupils per teacher (2025/26 staff census): 18.4pupils per teacher
Reached the expected standard in reading, writing and maths: 86% of pupils
Teachers who stayed the following year (3-year average): 82.9% of teachers

Data last refreshed 2026-11-10. Source: DfE and Ofsted open data, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Where it is

Distances are straight-line from the centre of your outward postcode, not a walking or driving route, and never a catchment or admissions prediction.

Nearby primary schools

Common questions about Coppermill Primary School

What is the latest Ofsted judgement?: Ofsted rated Coppermill Primary School Good at its inspection on 14/06/2024.
Where is the school and which authority runs it?: Coppermill Primary School is a primary school in Waltham Forest, postcode E17 6PB (URN 103078).
How does it compare with other local schools?: Build a free scorecard to rank Coppermill Primary School against nearby schools using your own priorities for results, attendance, distance and intake, with the source figures shown behind every number.

School advisor

Ask about Coppermill Primary School

Our advisor answers only from the published figures we hold for this school, and shows the source behind every claim. Your first question is free when you create an account.

Get this answered freeFree account, no card. The advisor add-on is optional afterwards.

See how this school fits your child

Score it against your own priorities alongside your shortlist, with the evidence behind every number.

Build a scorecard